Assignments -> Assignment 5 - Salmon -> Assignment 5
Homework Submission Form to upload your assignment.

Assignment 5 Questions

  1. Research and report on the total power requirements in the Pacific Northwest (in units of MegaWatts). How much of that power is currently in the form of hydroelectricity. Given what you found in the previous homework, do you think its feasible to remove these dams and replace that power with either wind or geothermal?

  2. Research and report on the Pacific Northwest Climate Index (the PNI) and how variations in that index seem to strongly correlate with the abundance of salmon in the Columbia river system.

    You have been assigned by your company, "Progress 'R Us" to study if there has been a decline in recent years of salmon at the McNary Dam and if there is a mortality rate of fish between The Dalles Dam and the McNary Dam. You have the following raw data from which to work with. When working with data like this, it's best to abbreviate it. So if you enter numbers into the the Tool don't be anal and put in a number of 126555 – just abbreviate that to 126 and remember that the units are thousands. It will save a lot of data entry time.

     YEARLY TOTALS OF SALMONIDS COUNTED OVER MCNARY DAM 1954-2002
     
     IN THOUSANDS OF SALMONIDS
     
     The Dalles Dam:
     
     1954 311
     1955 369
     1956 260
     1957 487
     1958 418
     1959 368
     1960 331
     1961 277
     1962 349
     1963 331
     1964 356
     1965 315
     1966 550
     1967 406
     1968 454
     1969 374
     1970 335
     1971 373
     1972 335
     1973 309
     1974 195
     1975 204
     1976 249
     1977 357
     1978 218
     1979 196
     1980 192
     1981 173
     1982 196
     1983 290
     1984 354
     1985 582
     1986 584
     1987 508
     1988 447
     1989 392
     1990 291
     1991 355
     1992 400
     1993 304
     1994 236
     1995 238
     1996 270
     1997 333
     1998 230
     1999 240
     2000 425
     2001 1105
     2002 838
     
     McNary Dam
     
     1957 539
     1958 537
     1959 453
     1960 371
     1961 355
     1962 381
     1963 361
     1964 379
     1965 398
     1966 567
     1967 554
     1968 570
     1969 481
     1970 462
     1971 507
     1972 465
     1973 444
     1974 332
     1975 332
     1976 346
     1977 455
     1978 290
     1979 276
     1980 256
     1981 291
     1982 331
     1983 415
     1984 527
     1985 769
     1986 778
     1987 730
     1988 642
     1989 570
     1990 382
     1991 426
     1992 471
     1993 376
     1994 288
     1995 298
     1996 360
     1997 426
     1998 289
     1999 427
     2000 678
     2001 1425
     2002 1141
     
     
     
     

    A. Compute the following for both dams:

    1. The mean and dispersion (standard deviation) for the period 1960 through 1999

    2. The mean and dispersion for the period 1990 - 1999

    3. The mean and dispersions for the period 1960 - 1989

      From that, establish the following:

      Are the counts at each dam in the period of 1990-1999 significantly lower than that seen in the period 1960-1989?

      Average the 2001 and 2002 counts together. What is the probability that you would get salmon counts this high, given the mean and dispersion in the period 1960-1999. How might this result change the thinking about the Pacific Northwest Salmon problem?

    B. Now look at the data carefully and identify any 5 year periods in which the salmon counts at either dam were statistically low compared to the average count in the 40 year period your derived above. In view of your results, how long of a time baseline should be used to accurately characterize the size of the salmon population in the Columbia River?